| |
| Proportion of Children Scoring in Psychopathological
Ranges |
| |
Upper
10% |
|
Upper 2% |
| |
% RR
|
|
% RR |
| Psychoticism |
24% |
2.4*** |
|
6% |
3.0* |
| Neuroticism |
16% |
1.6 |
|
2% |
1.0 |
| Criminality |
42% |
4.2*** |
|
14% |
7.0*** |
| Internalizing |
30% |
3.0*** |
|
16% |
8.0*** |
| Externalizing |
34% |
3.4*** |
|
20% |
10.0*** |
| Soc
Competence |
56% |
5.6*** |
|
30% |
15.0*** |
| Beh
Competence |
32% |
3.2*** |
|
20% |
10.0*** |
| Depression |
12% |
1.2 |
|
0% |
--- |
| Self-Esteem |
08% |
0.8 |
|
2% |
1.0 |
|
* p<.05, ***
p<.001 |
|
|
|
|
|
Journal
Abstract.
Fifty
Canadian children in out-of-home
placements under the jurisdiction of a child welfare district office
were
administered a battery of psychological assessment instruments. The
purpose was
to obtain an estimate of the proportion showing psychopathology. The
child's
social worker's opinion on the presence or absence of psychopathology
and need
for mental health services was also determined.
The results showed that 72% of
the children were rated by their social workers as displaying emotional
disturbance, with 56% recommended for counselling. Depending on the
cut-off
level used, the test results showed psychopathology rates ranging from
approximately 60-80%. Indigenous children were over-represented in the
sample, but
showed no meaningful differences from non-Native children in psychopathology
levels.
The overall profile of test results suggested that the sample was
characterized
by disorders that are relatively enduring and difficult to treat,
rather than
by those expected in reaction to adverse social conditions.
Note:
The 10% cutoff scores were set at a level that would capture the
highest-scoring 10% of individuals in the general population. Taking
psychoticism, for example, we find that 24% display this condition. The
relative risk (RR) value indicates that this rate is 2.4 times that of
the
general population. The 2% cutoff identifies more serious cases.

|